Jump to content


- - - - -

Review: Grand Theft Auto V

Rockstar Grand Theft Auto PS3 360 Grand Theft Auto V

Developer: Rockstar North
Publisher: Rockstar Games
Platform: PS3, Xbox 360
Release Date: September 17, 2013
ESRB: M for Mature

This review is based on the Xbox 360 version of the game, which was provided by the publisher



Back when the Nintendo 64 and PlayStation 1 duked it out for supremacy, I rented a game by the name of Body Harvest. It was so easy to be drawn to this Nintendo-exclusive title as it offered up an expansive world free for exploration. Many times I chose to kill survivors and run off with their trucks rather than save them from giant invading insects.

This was my first taste of the open world genre from DMA Designs, who would later become Rockstar Games. Memories of the game clouded my mind for years afterward until finally sinking into Grand Theft Auto 3 and Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas.

Posted Image


San Andreas became my life. At the age of 14 it seemed like the most incredible, free-form exploration possible. Wreaking havoc was massively fun and I would play for hours on the weekends. Since then, the series has mostly failed to recapture my attention. Why am I saying all this? It’s important to me to showcase that GTA played an important part in my gaming life and I intend to long cherish my memories of them. However, I am not so overcome by nostalgia that it’s impossible to view Grand Theft Auto V objectively.

Grand Theft Auto V is one hell of a game from a technological standpoint. It had very well better be after the hundreds of staff members and multi-million dollar fees connected with its creation. Requiring an approximately 8GB install on both PS3 and 360, GTA V offers some of the most breathtakingly realistic visuals available to console players. There is a fair amount of texture pop-in, but there’s not much Rockstar could have done to alleviate this engine-based problem. Overall, it looks damn good and serves as a nice way to show that the current console generation is still powerful.

In case you still haven’t heard, GTA V focuses around three lead characters - Franklin, Michael, and Trevor - who serve as, well, three sides of the same coin (if there were such a thing as a three-sided coin). Franklin is a young African American man trying to make his way out of the gangster lifestyle of Los Santos and go “legit”. Michael is middle aged, lives with his wife and adult children, and wishes to simply relax and leave his criminal past behind him. Trevor is a psychotic character who seeks out wanton destruction wherever he can.

Posted Image


Everyone is tied together by a life of crime as their work intersects. Franklin is the only new guy to the party though, as both Trevor and Michael used to run together. It was only when a heist went totally wrong that Trevor was required to go into hiding and mourned for the perceived death of his buddy Michael for years. With this proven to be a lie, the relationship between the two becomes incredibly tumultuous, often requiring the level headedness of Franklin to keep them from tearing each other up.

The ability to use three characters has been a big selling point of GTA V for a while. It’s new to the series and sounds quite cool in theory. In reality, the main reason to switch between characters is just to check out character-specific missions. Usually you can switch between the three men at will but there are times some are inaccessible. During important missions the game may even switch to someone else for you because that’s simply how Rockstar intended the scene to be played.

There are tons of possible missions to play. Beyond over fifty required ones, you can also engage in various side missions that range from incredibly dull to fun. Some inform the player about nuances of the selected character while others are just there to waste time. In any case, those interested in getting 100% completion will have a lot of work to do. Beyond doing all the missions there are also collectible items to find as well as special feats to perform such as flying under specified bridges. Rockstar definitely still has it when it comes to creating expansive worlds with lots to do.

Posted Image


Beyond the three characters to play there is another big addition to the series in the form of heists. Players must set up a heist by selecting one of two plans (safe or bombastic, basically), choosing your cast of crooks, and preparing all required elements. Once in the heist, no matter the choice, you usually end up having to fight off a swarm of cops at some point. After a successful heist, all involved parties get a cut and the game proceeds as normal. As touted as heists are, there are only six in the game and they are all tied to integral story missions. You definitely can’t just choose to stick up a joint for fun.

Once you’ve spent a while with the glorious open world experience though things start to become apparent. At least in my case, the more I played, the more it was clear that GTA V is a game utterly stuck in the past. For all the graphical advancements, there is little about the game which prepares us for the next generation. Put simply, it relies on many antiquated gaming techniques and sees no reason to change them. The GTA formula has not changed since its PS2 days.

First, you’ve got the heavy focus on driving. This has long been a staple of GTA (heck, the game is titled after stealing cars!). However, by now we have likely all been tainted by other open world games that offer something better. Sleeping Dogs had very prompt fast travel available. While GTA V does fast travel as well, you still have to take the moment to either find a taxi or wait for one. Then there is the elephant in the room by the name of Saints Row IV. After zipping over buildings and flying through that world it can be especially difficult to be so terrestrial here.

Posted Image


Driving becomes more of an issue because of how GTA V is structured. Often you will drive to a mission, then be tasked with driving to another location. Then, perhaps you’ll have to drive some more as you chase someone down or run from the cops. Driving is the name of the game and you’ll be doing copious amounts of it to weave through the huge world of Los Santos. This may become more difficult thanks to the unusual handling of cars. GTA has always seemed to have unusual car mechanics and that holds true here. No matter your driving skill in other games you’ll likely spend some time in GTA skidding and crashing all over the place.

Then there’s the humor, which appears to have barely evolved over the years. It may be because I’ve grown up in the years since playing San Andreas, but it’s just not that funny anymore. They hammer on a lot of the same tone of jokes as before and have only tweaked it to fit with modern issues such as corrupt corporations, social networking, and the like. But we’ve also seen a rise in satire and parody in American media so their tone stands as far less “daring” now. The goofy, ham-fisted parody also seems to now be at odds with what GTA V is attempting to pull off with its story.

But what of the story? Does Rockstar manage to coalesce each of the three character’s narratives in a meaningful way? They do mesh together well and it all makes sense. However, it really feels like the developer was most focused on Michael. He is the character who gets the most development by far overall and has a real “history” about him. Even though you can play as Franklin and Trevor and explore their own issues, their primary goal is to serve as secondary characters in Michael’s life. There are narrative choices that force you to play as others, they do not wash the feeling away that GTA V is still a story about Michael. It’s a good story, but unfortunate that the others could not have had their own full narratives.

Posted Image


Of course, there is also the heated issue of how characters are represented in the game. Everyone, from the lead characters to faux celebrities and the government of GTA V all are treated horribly. Everyone is someone to be made fun of. But does that really work when some groups really are mistreated in our society? What exactly is the point of shaming already underpowered peoples? It doesn’t seem a smart satire when you really start to break down the humor.

Not everyone will care and they are free to feel this way. But just because I do care about this topic doesn’t render me unfit to play. After all, if everyone who had any issues with the representation of characters in it stopped playing, then only horrible bigots, racists, sexist, etc would be playing. And, as gamers are keen to suggest, this is not the majority audience of the GTA series. It is a game for “everyone” who enjoys wrecking stuff in an open world - except apparently anyone who voices any problem with said games.

Like I said earlier, GTA V is a technical marvel. It looks great and handles mostly well when playing through the 15+ hours of main story. There are even interesting questions raised as to what motivates these men to kill and why they can’t stop. But beyond that there are a host of gameplay missteps that make it feel closer to a PS2 game than PS4. Many will still enjoy the game wholeheartedly and that is great for them. After all, this is a game with a 97 Metacritic score. For me, it seems that my tastes have changed in the 9 years since my last visit to San Andreas. At this point, it would be impossible for me to celebrate Grand Theft Auto V as anything other than a game trapped in its own massive shadow.

 

Pros:

+ Huge world rife for exploration
+ Copious possible amounts of playtime via side missions/collectibles/etc
+ Heists are an exciting new addition to the series

Cons:

- Jeez, did we always drive this much around expansive maps?
- Michael sees the most attention and even then only barely sees his character develop
- Instead of satire feeling exciting/fresh it feels aged - like something an older person trying to be “hip” would come up with


 

Overall Score: 6.5 (out of 10)
Decent


Grand Theft Auto V feels like it has lost itself in spectacle. As fun as it may be on the surface, it ends up being both devoid of any heart and dated.




12 Comments

Very insightful review Marcus! I don't care what the score is and all it matters is how the gamers feel about the game. Everyone has different opinions and views. I don't mind the score at all. I just hate when people get pissy over it not being a 9 or 10. Anyways you brought up some good points about the series and made me think back compared to the past GTA games and this. They do feel the same at times just different characters and stories. Sounds like they improved a little bit, but the controls and mechanics is still there. I do like the new feature of having multiple characters to play instead of one. As for that topic you mentionedm haven't really thought about it, but it has occured to me at some point with the representations wondering how people feel towards their kind or something. Like you said, it doesn't seem anyone cares because its a GTA title and stuff. Anyways do you plan on checking out the online portion and review it? It looks a lot interesting and fun with some new features compared to the last one. Once again great review! :D

I'm very surprised you gave it a 6.5 out of 10. I was expecting at least a 8.5 or better.

 

I think you can just take a taxi for the most part unless it's for a mission. Also online hasn't come out yet that might bump the score a little. To me the fun I have in GTA isn't about causing chaos but doing as much missions as possible and doing it all as lawfully as possible. As absurd as it sounds i love playing by the rules in open world games specially ones that encourage you to break them lol. I think the car mechanics are very important to the game as it is what it's known for. They probably spent a lot of time with the cars, the weight, the feel, ect so hard core fans could really feel immersed in the game. As someone who enjoys just driving around and taking in sites I don't think that the driving missions will really be a problem for me.

 

I remember playing vice city  at my friends house because he had a PS2. Those where the days, all we did was cause havoc and see who could last the longest getting chased by the cops with out dying lol.

 

Over all I'm kind of sad you didn't enjoy the game as much as I thought you would. Not because of the score or the review at all. But just because it seems you weren't that attached to the characters or the story and I can see how playing a game you can't really relate to be considered boring or dull.

This review more or less is how I feel about every Rockstar game this gen. They certainly are huge, well craft worlds with lots of content and great production values, but ultimately those same points seem to bring the game down and make it more a hassle to complete (your sentiments about driving apply here). I'm glad I'm not the only one that they don't click with, and it sounds like I'll be skipping GTA V, at least for a while.

Wow, great review Marcus!

 

I personally enjoyed driving through GTA IV's sprawling urban environment because living in Arizona I've never really seen that in person (besides a few trips to California, and even then that's different). In San Andreas I never really stayed in the city much, so I hadn't really explored a city sort of place at all until IV. I feel like I'd agree with you that travel would get dull if I tried playing the new game. GTA seems to have lost some of its charm unfortunately and it's partially why I was only slightly hyped for GTA V. Only the addition of multiple playable characters enticed me and even then that's barely a selling point. Well, I guess we'll just have to wait to see what else Rockstar has up their sleeves with the new console generation.

 

I really love the GTA series, but I'm glad to see you actually picking it apart. The "gripping story" and "multi-dimensional" characters aren't exactly as good as everyone says, in my opinion. I just play them to have fun, and if no new ultra fun additions were made I'd consider it skippable. ;)

But how is just, you know, randomly causing trouble? I have yet to play GTAV, but the appeal to games of its genre is the nonsense I can do outside of the story and side missions.

 

Are you doing a separate review of the GTA Online?

And now we wait for the GTA Review Trolls to come rolling in.....

FREE WEBSITE HITS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And now we wait for the GTA Review Trolls to come rolling in.....

 

I'm actually shocked none have posted yet, but the review is getting a ton of that on N4G atm; not surprising, though. It's sad that people refuse to believe that there are people who might not like something as much as them, because if they don't, they're obviously baiting for hits, right? :rolleyes:

ARE YOU DUMB? IT'S OBVIOUSLY A 10 BECAUSE GTA *hasn't played the game*?! I'LL MAKE YOU A DEAL MARCUS. UNTIL YOU GIVE GTA5 A 10 I WON'T BUY THE GAME. /Gamespot review comment parody over.

 

But yeah, I mostly agree with the general idea of your review. Like holy crap do you drive a lot in GTAV, that's something I found hardly any reviewers complain about (and one of my bigger complaints), which I think is a bit crazy. I mainly focused on the story and some side missions but the game has you drive so much so that I ran out of new music/radio banter a little over the halfway mark (and I listened to pretty much all stations, because why not? ). Even beyond that, the game felt less actiony to me than previous games because of the amount of time you spend driving vs.... well, doing anything else. (That's where I definitely feel like people call say they prefer Sleeping Dogs or Saints Row IV, since they weren't so slow in terms of structure. And while the taxi thing is amusing the 1st time if it doesn't show up... beyond that it isn't so much despite being "realistic" if you want to save time). But like Kikyou1 mentioned, I admit I do respect that they've done a pretty good job at really making a bunch of vehicles feel pretty different... but that is just touting production values, not overall quality.

 

I do disagree on the writing a bit, since I think it is far better than previous games, like San Andreas or III, which I didn't think was that clever even when I was younger (Even if the context of some of the writing isn't particularly great at times in GTA5). Like seriously, I think the Micheal and Trevor say some sharp stuff (well, Micheal is less interesting later on, but Trevor just takes over when he is introduced and has great delivery despite being all kindz of psycho/messed up). That said, I do think Franklin's story does seem to retread on a lot of familiar/shallow writing ground like San Adreas did, especially early in, so I can see at least that part being familiar (to the point of being occasionally incomprehensible by using the N-word so much.).

 

As for the story stuff I'm sort of mixed. Like I found Trevor and Micheal pretty entertaining, but Micheal really does feel sort cliched later on with the whole: "I thought I was out but [insert story events] are bringing me back in", opposed to the badass pop with all kinds of moral/family issues that were almost relatable despite being archetypes-ish (well, the son and daughter... but I gotta say, those kind of people definitely exist.).

 

And yeah, I got what I guess to be the 'happiest end' and even then it made me feel like not a whole like happened with the cast overall in terms of development by the end.

Spoiler

 

Oddly enough, I enjoyed the game, but I feel like it is more for the spectacle and some funny writing, than it being actually fun imo (like a Saints Row IV or Sleeping Dogs). That said, after that wall of text, I meant to imply that I like it a fair bit more than every GTA game, but even then, it isn't that amazing for the things it is bragging about (which is a bit different from your ending note).

But how is just, you know, randomly causing trouble? I have yet to play GTAV, but the appeal to games of its genre is the nonsense I can do outside of the story and side missions.

 

Are you doing a separate review of the GTA Online?

I think random havoc is kind of hard because the police are on you SO QUICKLY. It's not much to my taste anymore to just run around madly, but, even when focusing on missions there were a lot of times I got on police radar by barely doing anything. An example: I stood a foot away from a guy who got mad at me and proceeded to call the cops on his phone. Never touched him once! With how lively the police force are in this game I think you'd definitely need to input some codes first before being allowed to get into trouble and have long term fun with it.

 

As of right now, I don't intend to review GTA Online because it seems it might be a bit iffy (in regards to possible handling of purchases)... But if there's demand for it then maybe I'll give it a shot anyway!

I think random havoc is kind of hard because the police are on you SO QUICKLY. It's not much to my taste anymore to just run around madly, but, even when focusing on missions there were a lot of times I got on police radar by barely doing anything. An example: I stood a foot away from a guy who got mad at me and proceeded to call the cops on his phone. Never touched him once! With how lively the police force are in this game I think you'd definitely need to input some codes first before being allowed to get into trouble and have long term fun with it.

 

So the police in GTAV are more true-to-life then? Either its genius political commentary or accidental genius political commentary. 

Well written review and I got a lot out of it. I personally haven't played a single GTA game but I do want to someday. I guess I probably would enjoy any of the GTA game when I first play it but I'm sure it'll burn me out from all of the car traveling. I already know that became a problem for me in RDR. I think I would enjoy doing all the missions though, but that is just me. I try to do it all so I don't miss out on anything. I'm sure in the game I'll be like, well that was a pointless mission. But it wouldn't be surprising that you'll get your fair shares of useless missions because the game is so big. They can't have it this big without having fillers to go along. All in all I am glad to see another side of someone who isn't exactly in love with the game. And I like how you looked at this game as a way to move forward into the next generation instead of just focusing on the game itself.

 

 

 

Top Stories From Around the Web

 

About

Friends of GP

Site Navigation

Contact

  • General Inquiry
  • contact (at) gamepodunk (dot) com

  • Press Related
  • gp.press (at) gamepodunk (dot) com

Site Info