Jump to content



HEY, welcome back to GP! You should probably check this thread out here if this is your first time back on the forum since our upgrade. Suffice it to say, some things have changed! CLICK HERE to read more about it, including some new functionality.

Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Most Dissappointing Games of This Generation!

Sign in to follow this  


blog-0614471001333048178.jpegThe year of 2012 has been rather a disappointing year for gaming so far. After the stellar releases of 2011 (though the disappointment there was they were all sequels), 2012 has come acrop with fan favourites such as Ninja Gainden becoming mediocre thanks to its simplified 3rd instalment & the Resident Evil spin off Operation Racoon City whilst an interesting idea, it failed when it came to the simple gameplay & ludicrous AI. The biggest disappointment in the world of gaming this year has to be with the whole furore over the Mass Effect 3 ending leaving millions of fans (myself included), feeling let down as the credits rolled.

Recently I became a quarter of a century old and one of my housemates got me some games as a present. One was Mafia II which I like alot & it gave me a chance to try out the dlc that I missed out when I traded in my old copy (it was for Portal 2 so I think it was fair). The other game was Homefront. When this game first came out I was very intrigued by the main story (A unified Korea invading the U.S.), which was quite original for the military FPS genre. However after hearing the reviews of how short the campaign was I decided to leave it. While playing I actually enjoyed the campaign but it just ends. Quite abruptly too. I thought great in one month I've been disappointed by the ending of two games. Then this gave me the idea for a blog and write about these and the other games that I have been disappointed by this generation.


Oh and before I begin let me give out the obligitory !SPOILER WARNING! For these games.





Home Is Where the War Is! Is That Where the Rest of the Story Is?


Let's start with the game I mentioned earlier, Homefront had alot of things going for it when it was annouced. Boasting a massive 32 player multiplayer on massive maps (which is actually quite fun and the leveling system is not as unbalanced as CoD's), and a story which is interesting. After the death of Kim Jong Ill in 2012 (freaky eh?), his successor manages to unify Korea & Annex China & Japan. In 2027 Korea attacks the U.S. with a massive EMP strike & invades. You take the role of a fighter pilot recently recruited into the resistence movement. you spend the game going through different areas of occupied America, helping the resistence in a number of missions. Whilst the characters you are with aren't that well developed, the landscapes you go through are very well done and set the mood for the game perfectly. The music is also a highlight of the game. The downside is the single player is incredibly short. Even by CoD standards.

When the story was being advertised everywhere I was looking forward to playing a military FPS that actually had an original story to it & was written by the man who did Apocalypse Now & Red Dawn. The final piece of the game is where you are fighting for control of the Golden Gate Bridge. One of the hardest fights of the game & as you get control of the bridge you end up in a jeep shooting at an enemy goliath, then you get blown from the jeep, and watch one of your teamates run towards the enemy cavalry holding a flair as a signal for an airstrike & as the enemy gets bombarded, the camera pans out and fades with a voice over saying how they will win the fight. Then the credits appear. All in all it took me about 4 hours to complete the game. FOUR HOURS! All I was left with was the question "Is that it?" It was blatantly left for a sequel which makes me furious as I hate it when developers do that.





Bringing Tedium to New Heights!


Ah the Fable series one constant disappointment after another. Out of the trilogy though its Fable III that takes the 'P' in RPG (see what I did there?). Peter Molineux once again claiming that this time you will be flooded with hard and tough choices to make in the game. And once again you're not. Bascially the premise of the story is you're the brother/sister of the current king who has become selfish with his wealth when it comes to the needs of the kingdom. So you escape the palace and go on a quest to unite the land and overthrow him. Along the way you make promises to each group of people that you need to help overthreow your brother that you are intended to keep once you become king/queen. The game is simple Fable fare where you can fart & flirt with most NPCs and if they take your fancy you can marry them and have kids (the novel aspect of Fable II where now the novelty has worn off). You can also buy properties and take part in pointless & uninimaginative mini games to help earn you some money.

Once you overthrow your brother the game completely changes and you find out that the reason he was being stingy was so he could protect the ingdom from a pending evil, which is now your job to stop. You have a certain amount of time to raise enough funds to protect the kingdom or it will be destroyed. You spend the rest of the game, stuck in your castle, either keeping the promises you made to the people (which means less money), or go back on your word (which means money for the treasury). That's it. Those are the "tough choices" you have to make in the game. Which aren't that tough and if you could actually tell these people what was going to happen im sure they would have agreed instead of calling you a selfish bastard.

What really annoyed me about this game was the 'interactive' pause menu. Instead of pressing start and going into your inventory to see quests & what not, you end up in your "throne room" where all the wepaons you have are on the wall, and all your outfits are in their own room. What entails is bloody tedium which makes measuring the hight of your lawn with a ruler more fun. What's makes it worse is you only have like four weapons & outfits. Armour class & type have no bearing what so ever & your wepons level up or 'evolve' as you use them. Also the map is intereactive which increases the tedium of trying to navigate it.




Full Motion Capture Disappointment!


I hated L.A. Noire when it came out. Most likely that's down to it being my first professional review & I had only two & a half days in which to write it. Anyone who has done a review can tell you that's not a long time. Especially for a game as large as L.A. Noire. Because of this every negative aspect of the game that I found jumped out at me as this glaring error of epic proportions that hampered my way towards completing the game. Once I was done with it I immediately traded it in for a copy of Mortal Kombat & with Scorpion, every enemy I told to "get over here" I imagined to be Cole Phelps. After about a year I got convined to play it again as I had forgotten most of it & i hadn't actually completed it.

To my chagrin, the things that annoyed me the first time around were still there (though obvioulsy no where near as hate inducing). Whilst the game looked great & the attention to detail was astounding, it was the gameplay that really got to me. It was so simple. The combat was still unispriring and the gunplay reminded me of the GTA games on the PS2. The detective elements which drove the lure of the game aswell as the motion captured faces, became boring and predictable. Searching for evidence became an annoyance all its own with far too many red herrings.

To me the story culminated into a frantic mess. Parts of an over arcing story kept coming in an out at conventent times, and the downfall of Phelps towards the end seemed force and was too out of character from what he was for most of the game. What made me disappointed about this game was that Team Bondi seemed to spend more time focused on the motion capturing than anything else and the rest of the game suffered because of it.




A Prime Example of a Game Becoming Dissapointing The More That Gets Added to it!


I'm a massive Gears fan (or was). I've got all 3 games, read all the books, and have stood up for the game on a number of forums. However the longer that this game has been out the more disappointing I have become with it. Being the thrid game in a trilogy the game tried to be bigger, longer & more epic than the previous two. It does do that, the campaign is the largest of the three and the story ends nicely. However one of my friends pointed out that they do run out of ideas how to keep the campaign going. After playing through it again I realised that she was right. Most of the campaign involves you looking for fuel, and when you do find it, it gets destroyed so you have to look for more. That being said, Dom's final moments were to me, brilliantly done & if you had read the books, had great emotional impact. However the main focus of the story seemed to be Marcus & Cole, and to an extent Dom, but leaving Baird & Carmine in the background, which is a shame as out of all of them they were the ones that could have done with more screen time & characterisation.

The main gripe for me was multiplayer. Whilst the majority of the gameplay had been improved, there were two new guns, the retro lancer & the sawed of shotgun. Both were hated by veteran players (especially the sawed off), but they were there for novices which was fair enough (sort of before people satarted to abuse it). However the multiplayer was a vast improvement over Gears 2, and me & my friends enjoyed it immensely as it was balanced and you won through skill and not having access to more powerful weapons because you were a higher level (I'm looking at you CoD). Unfortunately Epic decided to throw dlc after dlc at the game & now it has become to bloated with content and gameplay tweaks to the game that it just isn't fun anymore. It was released in september & this month the 4th map pack dlc is released. That doesn't include the 6 title updates, two non map multiplayer dlc & the single player dlc. All this in such a short space of time has really spoilt the game in my opinion. There are too many maps and quite a few aren't that well designed. It's too much too soon, Epic didn't give the players enough time to digest one piece of dlc before giving them another. Not to mention that if you didn't buy the maps you couldn't play the game on the servers. Which is just digraceful behaviour.




If They Stay Like This One Will Be the Final One!


Ah Final Fantasy, how the might have fallen. Alot of people are contributing the decline in JRPGs to SqaureEnix as they are the industry leaders. I say that's not the case, there are plenty of good solid JRPGS out there, Xenoblade Chronicles & The Last Story are to name but a few. What I found most disappointing about this game (as did many others) was just how bloody linear the game is. It's pretty much just one corridoor after another. Considering how vast the lanscapes were in XII you think they would have expanded on that in a new generation on consoles. Instead we get treated to a film with walking elements. Whilst the story is still epic Final Fantasy, unlike prevous titles the beginning is so confusing you need to spend at least half an hour trying to figure out who is what. It took me awhile trying to figure out who or what the Pulse were, and who was a Pul'sie, a fal'cie or a l'cie. After explaining my confusion to my firend he told me that it takes a couple of hours for the game to actually explain to you which is which. A couple of hours? Not in those first two hours AFTER them. That is not good story structure. Even then by the end of the first disk I was still trying to figure it out (or maybe that's just me being slow on the uptake).

Whilst the linearity of the levels was infuriating enough the enemies are in the world like in XII and you can choose to fight them or go round them. However, due corridoor design of the levels most of the trime its impossible to evade enemies so you have to fight them anyway! It's pretty much just being able to see the random encounters. The combat goes back from the realtime of XII to a turn based system but you can only control the leader of your group, and the character progression in this game is something called Crystarium, where you unlock new abilities and spells. Later in the game you can pre select how your other party members fight but thats several hours into the game. Also the combat system itself is another hurdle to overcome in terms complexity. It took me awhile to get to grips with the mechanics, any by the time I got to grips with them I get new abilities available and have to figure out how to use them (really hope it's not just me that had these problems).

As the game progresses the story does improve and as you come to grips with everything the characters become more likable as you leanr more about them (even that whiny git Hope). But when you get to the third disc, the game switches into cinematic mode and the combat becomes one boss fight after another, which just gets tiresome after awhile. Especially as some boss fights can last 20 minutes or more, and some bosses will require trial and error when it comes to tactics (seriously someone in the comments, tell me you had the same problems so I don't feel like a complete plonker). It's just disappointing that throughout the game you have to endure so many things to experience the story.



I think I shall wrap it up there before I depress myself thinking of the hours I wasted. Anyone agree with me on these games? Dissagree? Let me know in the comments.

Thanks for reading!


Honourable Mentions:


The Baconing (Just not as good as the original two).

Mario Kart Wii (Why is there no co-op grand prix like in ALL the others?).

Mass Effect 3 (I think you know why).

Halo Reach (Poor uninspiring level design).

Duke Nukem Forever (I know there's alot but mainly only being able to hold two weapons).

Devil May Cry 4 (Stop whining Nero or should I say Dante Jr?).

Aliens Vs Predator (The PC classics are still the best).

GTA IV (Boring mandatory side missions, bad car handling).

Star Wars The Force Unleashed II (So much wasted potential. Still better than the Phantom Menace).

  • Like 1
Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

Nice review, a long read but good nonetheless! I kind of feel the same way with a lot of games and even movies, I keep hearing all the hype for one game or movie and then I get really excited to play or see them and when I finally do, I feel let down.


I'm pretty much at the point where I feel that I shouldn't think twice about it and just play or watch and leave it at that. As your DNF meme states it's almost better to set your expectations low because then you walk out at least somewhat satisfied, rather than immensely disappointed.


I think that's also a big problem that people have is they get really pumped up/psyched/excited/etc... for something and when it doesn't live up to their expectations they are left feeling empty. This may have had a lot to do with the backlash that ME3 had. A lot of people loved the series and this was the final installment and the ending from what I understand was just - bleh. So people were expecting this epic/massive conclusion to an amazing game series and they got nothing of the sort. Though I suppose there were other issues as well (from what I've been told).


I mean this does pose some interesting questions, when is a good time to end a game? Do you want a short but amazing gameplay? Do you want a longer but maybe repetitive gameplay? Where do you draw the line between too little and too much? What is a good way to end a game? Since you can't satisfy everyone, how do you go about ending a game so that you can at least please the majority or allow people to at least appreciate the ending even if they don't like it? I guess one answer to this is the option for multiple endings but what about games that only have one ending?


Anyways, just some food for thought.

Share this comment

Link to comment

I wanted to say I'm SO GLAD that I'm not the only one who had a big problem with L.A. Noire. Yes, I can tell that a lot of work was put into making it very polished but I just didn't enjoy it and thought the progression of Phelps was not entertaining. Sure, lots of people in films and shows and shown descending into a very unlikable person but it can still be entertaining! Phelps just did a complete 360 from who he had been for like half the game without any indication he was going to be... and then we're still supposed to feel for him in the end? Sorry, but his "sacrifice" wasn't at all redeeming of his previous actions. If anything he was just like ditching responsibility for anything!

Share this comment

Link to comment

SeveranceZero: Thank-you! When it comes to the ending of Mass 3 it was more the fact that no matter what I did throughout the three games it makes no difference what so ever! Regardlesss of who dies or how many paragon or renengade points you have! It was the fact that the ending made me feel rather empty & has put me off playing any of them sadly! That and also it didn't make any bloody sense! Plus what REALLY annoys me about this debacle is the question of the artists integerity of changing the ending, despite the fact that the ending had already been changed. When the original was leake don the internet EA made Bioware re write the ending but Drew Karpyshyn had already left Bioware and so Casey Hudson shut himself off from the rest of the writing tgeam and they weren't allowed to give any input! So its hard to argue the case for artisitc integrity when there is none & its Hudson trying to hog all the glory! that's why he stood by the ending so much because he's the one that wrote it!


When it comes to other endings you're write that is a good question! Its quite true, if you're playing a game where you are sucked into the story then it will end quicker than you want whereas when you finish a game you weren't as interested in you'll be going "thank-god that's over!" After dwelling on it for a bit I could only think of Resident Evil 2 & 3 where the stories ended at just the right lengths.


Marcus Estrada; I know! All my house mates tha tplayed it all hated the ending and thought it didn't make sense. It seemed that Team Bondi were getting somewhere with the story then forgot about two main aspects of Noir, the femme fatale and the protagonist's fall and they ran out of time, so they just crammed it all in into the last act.

Share this comment

Link to comment

I would argue that Final Fantasy XIV was pretty terrible as well. It had beautiful graphics, but the storyline was weak and the class system really crippled the game. Not to mention the horrible dev team. I think it should have stayed a Free MMO . But that's just me. I'm really hoping SquareEnix can still make a good game.. I want to believe.

Share this comment

Link to comment

I would argue that Final Fantasy XIV was pretty terrible as well.


Couldn't agree more, the class system was god awful and contributed nothing to the game. You mention a storyline, could it even be called that? I am of the opinion that they believe they can throw anything under the Final Fantasy name and people will buy it. Now they want to make it a Free MMORPG? Well good luck with that. I'll be waiting with my flying pigs.

Share this comment

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now